Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/development-process: add info onmaintainers

From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Tue Apr 06 2010 - 19:26:47 EST

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:17:05 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +- Please note that most maintainers also have day jobs, so merging
> + your patch may not be their highest priority. If your patch is
> + getting feedback about changes that are needed, you should either
> + make those changes or justify why they should not be made. If your
> + patch has no review complaints but is not being merged by its
> + appropriate subsystem or driver maintainer, you should be persistent
> + in updating the patch to the current kernel so that it applies cleanly
> + and keep sending it for review & merging.

I'd prefer to spell out "and" in that last line, being the sort of
person that I am. Either way:

Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at