[101/165] ext4: Fix insertion point of extent in mext_insert_across_blocks()

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jul 30 2010 - 13:33:42 EST


2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

commit 5fd5249aa36fad98c9fd5edced352939e54f9324 upstream (as of v2.6.33-git11)

If the leaf node has 2 extent space or fewer and EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT
ioctl is called with the file offset where after the 2nd extent
covers, mext_insert_across_blocks() always tries to insert extent into
the first extent. As a result, the file gets corrupted because of
wrong extent order. The patch fixes this problem.

Signed-off-by: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ mext_insert_across_blocks(handle_t *hand
}

o_start->ee_len = start_ext->ee_len;
+ eblock = le32_to_cpu(start_ext->ee_block);
new_flag = 1;

} else if (start_ext->ee_len && new_ext->ee_len &&
@@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ mext_insert_across_blocks(handle_t *hand
* orig |------------------------------|
*/
o_start->ee_len = start_ext->ee_len;
+ eblock = le32_to_cpu(start_ext->ee_block);
new_flag = 1;

} else if (!start_ext->ee_len && new_ext->ee_len &&
@@ -502,6 +504,7 @@ mext_leaf_block(handle_t *handle, struct
le32_to_cpu(oext->ee_block) + oext_alen) {
start_ext.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(le32_to_cpu(new_ext.ee_block) -
le32_to_cpu(oext->ee_block));
+ start_ext.ee_block = oext->ee_block;
copy_extent_status(oext, &start_ext);
} else if (oext > EXT_FIRST_EXTENT(orig_path[depth].p_hdr)) {
prev_ext = oext - 1;
@@ -515,6 +518,7 @@ mext_leaf_block(handle_t *handle, struct
start_ext.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(
ext4_ext_get_actual_len(prev_ext) +
new_ext_alen);
+ start_ext.ee_block = oext->ee_block;
copy_extent_status(prev_ext, &start_ext);
new_ext.ee_len = 0;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/