Re: [GIT PULL] iBFT features for v2.6.36
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Aug 02 2010 - 16:28:45 EST
On 08/02/2010 12:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Unfortunately, we're increasingly seeing a proliferation of this kind of
>> nonstandard ACPI tables, because it is difficult to add data to ACPI at
> Keep in mind that iBFT is now a standard (woot!)
Yes, but the discovery method is ad hoc, as opposed to the standard ACPI
>> runtime. gPXE creates an aBFT table for AoE and sBFT for SRP, and
>> memdisk uses mBFT for MEMDISK at the moment.
> Oh man, didn't know those existed at all.
>> It would be good to have some kind of common structure framework for these.
> I need to grok those tables some more to figure out what they all do.
More or less the same thing as iBFT, but for AoE, SRP, or in-memory disk.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/