Re: [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc_hide

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Wed Aug 11 2010 - 01:44:46 EST


2010-08-10 (í), 19:46 +0900, Namhyung Kim:

> No problem. :-) But before that, let me clarify this: It seems
> -fno-strict-overflow is all about the signed arithmetic and
> __pa_symbol() does unsigned one. Is it really matters here?
>
>

Oops, my bad, I found the description of -fstrict-overflow in gcc manual
that it also affects the semantics of pointer and unsigned integer
arithmetic. Sorry for the noise.

--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/