Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: Don't assign when a comparison is intended

[richard -rw- weinberger]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > In drivers/net/3c59x.c::vortex_probe1() we have this code:
>> >
>> >        if (gendev) {
>> >                if ((pdev = DEVICE_PCI(gendev))) {
>> >                        print_name = pci_name(pdev);
>> >                }
>> >
>> >                if ((edev = DEVICE_EISA(gendev))) {
>> >                        print_name = dev_name(&edev->dev);
>> >                }
>> >        }
>> >
>> > I believe these assignments were intended to be comparisons.
>> > If I'm correct, then here's a patch to fix that up.
>>
>> I don't think so. Look at the extra brackets.
>>
>> The code can also written as:
>>
>> pdev = DEVICE_PCI(gendev);
>> if(pdev)
>>   print_name = pci_name(pdev);
>>
>
> Arrgh, I completely missed that - damn.
> You are correct I think and my patch is wrong.
> Thanks for taking a look.

BTW: gcc is smart enough to catch such typos.

if(x = 3){
 ...
}

...would trigger a warning like this one:
"warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value"

>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
>

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/