Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: introduce static_branch()
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Jan 05 2011 - 14:51:23 EST
* David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 11:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* H. Peter Anvin<hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>On 01/05/2011 09:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >>>>This patch will conflict with the MIPS jump label support that Ralf has
> >>>>queued up for 2.6.38.
> >>>Can you disable that support for now? As Linus said at Kernel Summit,
> >>>other archs jumped too quickly onto the jump label band wagon. This
> >>>change really needs to get in, and IMO, it is more critical to clean up
> >>>the jump label code than to have other archs implementing it.
> >>Ralf is really good... perhaps we can get the conflicts resolved?
> >Yep, the best Git-ish way to handle that is to resolve the conflicts whenever they
> >happen - i.e. whoever merges his tree upstream later. No need for anyone to 'wait'
> >or undo anything.
> There will be no git conflicts, as the affected files are disjoint.
I regularly resolve semantic conflicts in merge commits - or in the first followup
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/