Re: Perf ABI versioning
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 15:38:49 EST
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> But instead of a global tracing ABI number, I would rather suggest
> one number per tracepoint subsystem (sched, power, etc...).
> Ideally it would be per event, but sometimes those events tend to be
> renamed or a whole tracepoint subsystem refactored (see workqueue
> lately). Hence it might be better per subsystem.
What's wrong with what we have? the /format file is pretty unique to
function as a version number of you use a hash over it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/