Re: Perf ABI versioning
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 15:40:57 EST
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:39:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > But instead of a global tracing ABI number, I would rather suggest
> > one number per tracepoint subsystem (sched, power, etc...).
> > Ideally it would be per event, but sometimes those events tend to be
> > renamed or a whole tracepoint subsystem refactored (see workqueue
> > lately). Hence it might be better per subsystem.
> What's wrong with what we have? the /format file is pretty unique to
> function as a version number of you use a hash over it.
Yeah we could in fact use it to find if fields have been added,
removed. Right, all in one that looks enough to me.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/