[105/105] nfsd4: fix oops on lock failure
From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Apr 12 2011 - 10:39:54 EST
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 23fcf2ec93fb8573a653408316af599939ff9a8e upstream.
Lock stateid's can have access_bmap 0 if they were only partially
initialized (due to a failed lock request); handle that case in
free_generic_stateid.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:380!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
Modules linked in: nfs fscache md4 nls_utf8 cifs ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat bridge stp llc nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipv6 ppdev parport_pc parport pcnet32 mii pcspkr microcode i2c_piix4 BusLogic floppy [last unloaded: mperf]
Pid: 1468, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.38+ #120 VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform
EIP: 0060:[<e24f180d>] EFLAGS: 00010297 CPU: 0
EIP is at nfs4_access_to_omode+0x1c/0x29 [nfsd]
EAX: ffffffff EBX: dd758120 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000004
ESI: dd758120 EDI: ddfe657c EBP: dd54dde0 ESP: dd54dde0
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1468, ti=dd54c000 task=ddc92580 task.ti=dd54c000)
Stack:
dd54ddf0 e24f19ca 00000000 ddfe6560 dd54de08 e24f1a5d dd758130 deee3a20
ddfe6560 31270000 dd54df1c e24f52fd 0000000f dd758090 e2505dd0 0be304cf
dbb51d68 0000000e ddfe657c ddcd8020 dd758130 dd758128 dd7580d8 dd54de68
Call Trace:
[<e24f19ca>] free_generic_stateid+0x1c/0x3e [nfsd]
[<e24f1a5d>] release_lockowner+0x71/0x8a [nfsd]
[<e24f52fd>] nfsd4_lock+0x617/0x66c [nfsd]
[<e24e57b6>] ? nfsd_setuser+0x199/0x1bb [nfsd]
[<e24e056c>] ? nfsd_setuser_and_check_port+0x65/0x81 [nfsd]
[<c07a0052>] ? _cond_resched+0x8/0x1c
[<c04ca61f>] ? slab_pre_alloc_hook.clone.33+0x23/0x27
[<c04cac01>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0xd2
[<c04835a0>] ? __call_rcu+0xd7/0xdd
[<e24e0dfb>] ? fh_verify+0x401/0x452 [nfsd]
[<e24f0b61>] ? nfsd4_encode_operation+0x52/0x117 [nfsd]
[<e24ea0d7>] ? nfsd4_putfh+0x33/0x3b [nfsd]
[<e24f4ce6>] ? nfsd4_delegreturn+0xd4/0xd4 [nfsd]
[<e24ea2c9>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x1ea/0x33e [nfsd]
[<e24de6ee>] nfsd_dispatch+0xd1/0x1a5 [nfsd]
[<e1d6e1c7>] svc_process_common+0x282/0x46f [sunrpc]
[<e1d6e578>] svc_process+0xdc/0xfa [sunrpc]
[<e24de0fa>] nfsd+0xd6/0x115 [nfsd]
[<e24de024>] ? nfsd_shutdown+0x24/0x24 [nfsd]
[<c0454322>] kthread+0x62/0x67
[<c04542c0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x114/0x114
[<c07a6ebe>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
Code: eb 05 b8 00 00 27 4f 8d 65 f4 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 83 e0 03 55 83 f8 02 89 e5 74 17 83 f8 03 74 05 48 75 09 eb 09 b8 02 00 00 00 eb 0b <0f> 0b 31 c0 eb 05 b8 01 00 00 00 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 89 d6 8d
EIP: [<e24f180d>] nfs4_access_to_omode+0x1c/0x29 [nfsd] SS:ESP 0068:dd54dde0
---[ end trace 2b0bf6c6557cb284 ]---
The trace route is:
-> nfsd4_lock()
-> if (lock->lk_is_new) {
-> alloc_init_lock_stateid()
3739: stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
->if (status && lock->lk_is_new && lock_sop)
-> release_lockowner()
-> free_generic_stateid()
-> nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode()
-> nfs4_access_to_omode()
380: BUG(); *****
This problem was introduced by 0997b173609b9229ece28941c118a2a9b278796e.
Reported-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -397,10 +397,13 @@ static void unhash_generic_stateid(struc
static void free_generic_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp)
{
- int oflag = nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode(stp);
+ int oflag;
- nfs4_file_put_access(stp->st_file, oflag);
- put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
+ if (stp->st_access_bmap) {
+ oflag = nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode(stp);
+ nfs4_file_put_access(stp->st_file, oflag);
+ put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
+ }
kmem_cache_free(stateid_slab, stp);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/