Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: add arch/tile/drivers/ directory with SROM driver

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Sat May 21 2011 - 04:33:32 EST

On Saturday 21 May 2011 09:46:55 Eric Biederman wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 5/20/2011 6:40 PM, Eric Biederman wrote:
> > The direct motivation for this case is to "impedance match" to the
> > hypervisor driver for this device, which handles sector management
> > internally, so the Linux device doesn't have to. Having a 'flush' method
> > avoids excessive re-writes of the same sector for certain access patterns.
> > The only alternatives that I see are to rewrite the tile userspace tools,
> > but they are the way they are because the current model gives good
> > consistency guarantees for writing the boot rom in the presence of
> > arbitrary failure modes; or, to add something like a delayed timer event
> > that allows the Linux driver to notify the hypervisor driver that writes
> > are likely complete and it can write out the last sector. Neither of these
> > are particularly attractive.
> What is wrong with an mtd driver?
> Looking a bit back into the conversation it appears clear that you are
> talking about something that resembles NOR flash with multiple sectors,
> etc.
> eeproms have random byte access and are typically 256 bytes. You devices
> doesn't sound anything like an eeprom.

MTD implies that you have low-level access to the NOR flash registers,
which this one doesn't. It's certainly not the right Linux interface
for a high-level flash device, and there is no precedent for this at
all in Linux.

We do have precedent for multiple interfaces that have the same
purpose as this one:


And then some more that I missed, plus the ones that use MTD.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at