Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix dynamic ftrace filter reset issue
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Mar 26 2012 - 14:45:25 EST
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 09:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That said, I may consider taking the patch, as another way of resetting
> the tracer. I have to see what workflows it will affect first.
This is what I was afraid of. The tracers irqsoff and preemptoff do not
get reset if you echo the tracer name into the current_tracer. This
makes different tracers inconsistent.
All tracers must act the same. So, it's a no go for this patch, at least
in its current form.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/