Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Mar 28 2012 - 05:09:09 EST

> I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to
> start with, these seem more like debugging messages? I can't see how
> they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be
> debug instead?

Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.

Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
full information.


ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at