Re: [EDAC ABI v13 04/25] events/hw_event: Create a Hardware EventsReport Mecanism (HERM)

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em 09-05-2012 11:24, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:15:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 09-05-2012 11:06, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
>>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:51:05AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>>>> Now, if you really want to have a generic mechanism for RAS, used
>>>>> by all the kernel, then I don't have a problem with you adding it
>>>>> to include/ras/hw_event.h or somewhere in that vicinity along with
>>>>> making it generic enough for other users and then taking care of it and
>>>>> developing it to address users' needs.
>>>>
>>>> I'm ok to move it to include/ras, but, if I remember well from my initial
>>>> tests when I wrote this, several kernel versions ago, there is/was
>>>> a limitation that required that all trace events should be under
>>>> include/trace/events/.
>>>>
>>>> One other option would be to call it as "include/trace/events/ras.h".
>>>>
>>>> Steven,
>>>>
>>>> Would it be possible/recommendable to move this trace header
>>>> to include/linux/ras/hw_event.h?
>>>
>>> Oh, yeah, I remember vaguely something like that. Lets wait what Steven
>>> has to say.
> 
> btw, http://lwn.net/Articles/383362/ explains how to define tracepoints outside
> of include/trace/events.
> 
> [ â ]
> 
>>> and above says "Hardware Events Report Method (HERM)" The fact that you
>>> yourself are not exactly sure about what this abbreviation is supposed
>>> to be/mean/etc, simply should tell you that it is causing only confusion
>>> with no benefit what-so-ever, even to you!
>>
>> Fixed.
> 
> No, you haven't. It still says HERM below. Please drop the marketing speak!

Nah, this is not marketing speak. HERM is not a trademark. amd64_edac, on the other
hand, is using a trademark on his name. If we use your logic, this would need to
be renamed to something else, to avoid using a "marketing speak".

We need some name to differentiate between the broken EDAC core where modern
memory controllers are not properly represented and reports errors on 
fake csrows/channels from the EDAC+HERM core that will properly provide the
error information to where it really belongs.

In other words, HERM is just an acronym[1] to the version to point to where 
EDAC starts to work fine with modern memory controllers.

[1] Btw, EDAC is also an acronym for Error Detection And Correction.

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/