Re: [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sat Dec 28 2013 - 11:33:48 EST
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:14:16PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> X32 uses the same kernel system call interface as x86-64 for many
> system calls. However, "long" is 64-bit for x86-64 and is 32-bit for
> x32. Where long or unsigned long are used in struct types for such
> system calls, they are wrong for x32. __kernel_[u]long_t is [unsigned]
> long for all ABIs other than x32. I am submitting 8 patches to replace
> long or unsigned long with __kernel_[u]long_t so that those struct types
> can be used with x32 system calls.
Independent on how this fixes things, how does the kernel_long_t name
here make any sense?
On x86-64 "kernel" long always is 64 bits wide. The userspace ABI long
might be 32 or 64bits wide.
Currently kernel_long_t has almost no uses, so it might be a good time
to fix the name, define the rules for it, and last but not least
properly document the intent for thse types.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/