Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
From: Arne Wiebalck
Date: Fri Sep 05 2014 - 13:09:34 EST
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@xxxxxxxxx>
> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
>>> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
>>> cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
>>> a good time to pipe up.
>> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and backport these though :-)
> I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production.
More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider scale now.
If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature