Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW, Mutex block
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen
Date: Thu Mar 12 2015 - 04:16:37 EST
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:42:38PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
>> I'm pretty anxious about this one, as my current work has a dependency on it.
>> Virtually the entirety of the QualComm SOC work is dependent on this
>> because it's needed by the interprocessor communication framework
>> and the regulator driver.
>> I assume we're waiting on the response from Ohad about getting this upstream?
>> It's been almost 2 weeks with no reply.
>> Ohad - do you plan to do anything with this patch? We seem to be at an impasse
>> (once again).
> With Suman's patches and this, the ball is in Ohad's court. I believe Ohad
> does this work in his off time as it is unpaid work.
I definitely plan to get this and Suman's work merged upstream.
As Andy mentioned I'm doing this in my off time and unfortunately this
means I'm sometimes less available than I wish I was. Not too long ago
this activity (as well as the maintainership of remoteproc and rpmsg)
was graciously sponsored by one of the silicon vendors but that is no
longer the case.
Anyway I plan to get to this in the weekend, hope to push things forward.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/