Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce binding for always-on clock support
From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 11:11:58 EST
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse
> > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then
> > they have no foundation for recourse.
> > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker?
> Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl,
> to make people aware they should think twice?
That's a really nice idea!
Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)?
> Nah, people don't read documentation, don't run checkpatch, ignore compiler
> warnings, etc...
You can only wrap people in so much cotton wool. If they then decide
to ignore all the warnings and jump, woe betide them.
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/