Re: Module stacking next steps

From: Kees Cook
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 22:11:27 EST

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:55:51AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> > James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> > the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> > procedure would you like to follow?
> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?

At the very worst, I see it as a very nice clean up.

At best, I see it as extremely useful for the things I want to do, with
various "minor" LSM working together.

> Any objections or concerns?

As far as I'm concerned, I'm very happy with it.



Kees Cook
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at