Re: Module stacking next steps
From: Kees Cook
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 22:11:27 EST
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:55:51AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> > the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> > procedure would you like to follow?
> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
At the very worst, I see it as a very nice clean up.
At best, I see it as extremely useful for the things I want to do, with
various "minor" LSM working together.
> Any objections or concerns?
As far as I'm concerned, I'm very happy with it.
Kees Cook @outflux.net
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/