Re: dell_rbtn - kernel panic at boot...

From: Darren Hart
Date: Mon May 25 2015 - 00:44:41 EST


On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> >
> > <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
> > > built, but died a glorious death at boot.
> >
> > I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order,
> > dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and dies in
> > dell_rbtn_notifier_register() in call to
> > driver_for_each_device(&rbtn_driver.drv, ...) because rbtn_driver has
> > not been registered yet and thus half-initlalized.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> pr_debug() messages could be useful... but no idea if we can get them.
>
> Is there any way to fix that dependency race condition? Could
> driver_attach() function call help?

I believe you can avoid this by moving dell-rbtn earlier in the Makefile than
dell-laptop - but this is fragile and a hack to resolve a dependency problem.

I suppose this is why thinkpad-acpi.c is huge, and why having separate drivers
talk to eachother is discouraged.

dell-laptop seems to be the base, while dell-rbtn is the more specific of the
two - which makes dell-laptop calling a dell-rbtn function which requires
dell-rbtn to have been initialized prior a poor approach.

Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be rolled into
dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/