On Thu 28 Jul 11:33 PDT 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:55:11AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:[..]
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Do not quite like it... I'd rather asynchronous request give out a
firmware status pointer that could be used later on.
pcu->fw_st = request_firmware_async(IMS_PCU_FIRMWARE_NAME,
In the remoteproc case (patch 6) this would clean up the code, rather
than replacing the completion API 1 to 1. I like it!