Re: [PATCH v14 3/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Improve printk relevant code

From: Fu Wei
Date: Wed Oct 26 2016 - 04:28:51 EST


Hi Mark,

On 20 October 2016 at 23:32, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:11AM +0800, fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type)
>> {
>> - pr_info("Architected %s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n",
>> - type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "",
>> - type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "",
>> - type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? "mmio" : "",
>> - (unsigned long)arch_timer_rate / 1000000,
>> - (unsigned long)(arch_timer_rate / 10000) % 100,
>> - type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ?
>> - (arch_timer_uses_ppi == VIRT_PPI) ? "virt" : "phys" :
>> - "",
>> - type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? "/" : "",
>> - type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ?
>> - arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" :
>> - "");
>> + pr_info("%s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n",
>> + type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ? "cp15" : "",
>> + type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? " and " : "",
>> + type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ? "mmio" : "",
>> + (unsigned long)arch_timer_rate / 1000000,
>> + (unsigned long)(arch_timer_rate / 10000) % 100,
>> + type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER ?
>> + (arch_timer_uses_ppi == VIRT_PPI) ? "virt" : "phys" :
>> + "",
> Please restore the additional indent on this line...
>
>> + type == (ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER) ? "/" : "",
>> + type & ARCH_MEM_TIMER ?
>> + arch_timer_mem_use_virtual ? "virt" : "phys" :
>> + "");
>
> ... and these two.
>
> No matter what checkpatch says, I prefer the code that way so as to keep
> the ternary clear.

yes, NP, I have fixed it :-)

>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -768,7 +769,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_init(void)
>> return ret;
>>
>> arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI];
>> -
>> +
>
> Please mention the whitespace fixup in the commit message. It's
> surprising otherwise.

OK, added this message.

>
> With all that:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>

Great thanks :-)

>
> Thanks,
> Mark.



--
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat