Re: [RFC] arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu: Update with new gcc disponible 64bits CPU uarchs.

From: Gustavo da Silva
Date: Mon Dec 19 2016 - 12:46:36 EST


hehehe

Thanks, Petkov!

Instead distros, I was thinking in HPC vendors, (SGI, etc), where
those can ship an optmized kernel compiled to the target CPU inside
the HPC equipment, resulting in a better product.

Well, I've reading a HPC equipment vendor documentation explaining
that warrant will be lost if
user compile&install a new kernel for that equipment.

So, make sense the HPC vendor ships a optimized kernel for target HPC customer.

About the proof, HPC vendors would give us an answer.

:)



2016-12-19 15:31 GMT-02:00 Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 03:09:50PM -0200, Gustavo da Silva wrote:
>> Good afternon!
>>
>> Are there reasons to 'Kconfig.cpu' and 'Makefile' not contains the
>> 'gcc -mtune=???'
>> recent options?
>
> This keeps popping up every couple of months. I was wondering when it is
> going to appear again and there you are. :)
>
> Here's a major reason: 99% of the kernels are built with
> -m(arch|tune)=generic. Think distros.
>
> Also, I am still waiting for a proof that CPU-optimized kernels have any
> advantages compared to the =generic ones.
>
> HTH.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.



--
Atenciosamente,

Gustavo da Silva
gustavodasilva@xxxxxxxxx