Re: [PATCH 4/9] posix-clocks: Enable compat syscalls always

From: Deepa Dinamani
Date: Mon Nov 13 2017 - 18:26:52 EST


On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> -
>> COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct compat_timespec __user *, rqtp,
>> struct compat_timespec __user *, rmtp)
>> {
>> @@ -1574,7 +1572,6 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct compat_timespec __user *, rqtp,
>> current->restart_block.nanosleep.compat_rmtp = rmtp;
>> return hrtimer_nanosleep(&tu, HRTIMER_MODE_REL, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
>> }
>> -#endif
>
> So if I'm not missing something important this will make the compat syscall
> define available even for
>
> CONFIG_X86_64=y
> CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=n
> CONFIG_X86_X32=n
>
> which is wrong because in that configuration we don't have any 32bit
> executable support. So why would we need a compat syscall in that case?

I was thinking that we would switch the meaning of CONFIG_64BIT_TIME
after all architectures have enabled support for 64 bit time_t
syscalls.
After that, I was going to use the config to mean enable only 64 bit
time_t support and so all compat syscalls would have #ifndef
CONFIG_64BIT_TIME around them.
Compat syscalls do not mean compat anymore for these time syscalls as
the data structure is defined in a way that they are the same on 64
bit and 32 bit architectures.

But, you are right. It will leave in compat syscalls when it is not
required now.
I could add a dependency on CONFIG_COMPAT and __BITS_PER_LONG for now
if you prefer. I could introduce additional dependencies later on.

-Deepa