Re: [PATCH 1/1] target:separate tx/rx cmd_puds

From: David Disseldorp
Date: Thu Apr 05 2018 - 07:12:24 EST


Hi,

The commit summary has a typo (cmd_puds). That said, this change
isn't iSCSI specific, so using "pdu" here doesn't make much sense IMO.

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:52:43 +0800, Zhang Zhuoyu wrote:

> Separate tx/rx cmd_pdus in order to distinguish LUN read/write IOPS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhuoyu <zhangzhuoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_stat.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> include/target/target_core_base.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> index f0db91e..9099494 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> @@ -706,7 +722,8 @@ static ssize_t target_stat_tgt_port_hs_in_cmds_show(struct config_item *item,
> CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, indx);
> CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, name);
> CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, port_index);
> -CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, in_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, tx_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, rx_cmds);

I don't think the in_cmds metric should be deleted here. It could be
calculated on the fly via tx_cmds + rx_cmds + nodata_cmds.

Cheers, David