Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: fix possible page fault for nbd disk

[Mike Christie]

On 08/21/2019 06:57 AM, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When the NBD_CFLAG_DESTROY_ON_DISCONNECT flag is set and at the same
> time when the socket is closed due to the server daemon is restarted,
> just before the last DISCONNET is totally done if we start a new connection
> by using the old nbd_index, there will be crashing randomly, like:
> 
> <3>[  110.151949] block nbd1: Receive control failed (result -32)
> <1>[  110.152024] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000058000000840
> <1>[  110.152063] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> <1>[  110.152083] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> <6>[  110.152094] PGD 0 P4D 0
> <4>[  110.152106] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> <4>[  110.152120] CPU: 0 PID: 6698 Comm: kworker/u5:1 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.3.0-rc4+ #2
> <4>[  110.152136] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
> <4>[  110.152166] Workqueue: knbd-recv recv_work [nbd]
> <4>[  110.152187] RIP: 0010:__dev_printk+0xd/0x67
> <4>[  110.152206] Code: 10 e8 c5 fd ff ff 48 8b 4c 24 18 65 48 33 0c 25 28 00 [...]
> <4>[  110.152244] RSP: 0018:ffffa41581f13d18 EFLAGS: 00010206
> <4>[  110.152256] RAX: ffffa41581f13d30 RBX: ffff96dd7374e900 RCX: 0000000000000000
> <4>[  110.152271] RDX: ffffa41581f13d20 RSI: 00000580000007f0 RDI: ffffffff970ec24f
> <4>[  110.152285] RBP: ffffa41581f13d80 R08: ffff96dd7fc17908 R09: 0000000000002e56
> <4>[  110.152299] R10: ffffffff970ec24f R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff96dd7374e900
> <4>[  110.152313] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff96dd7374e9d8 R15: ffff96dd6e3b02c8
> <4>[  110.152329] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff96dd7fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> <4>[  110.152362] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> <4>[  110.152383] CR2: 0000058000000840 CR3: 0000000067cc6002 CR4: 00000000001606f0
> <4>[  110.152401] Call Trace:
> <4>[  110.152422]  _dev_err+0x6c/0x83
> <4>[  110.152435]  nbd_read_stat.cold+0xda/0x578 [nbd]
> <4>[  110.152448]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[  110.152468]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[  110.152478]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[  110.152491]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[  110.152501]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[  110.152511]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[  110.152522]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[  110.152533]  recv_work+0x35/0x9e [nbd]
> <4>[  110.152547]  process_one_work+0x19d/0x340
> <4>[  110.152558]  worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
> <4>[  110.152568]  kthread+0xfb/0x130
> <4>[  110.152577]  ? process_one_work+0x340/0x340
> <4>[  110.152609]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> <4>[  110.152637]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> 
> This is very easy to reproduce by running the nbd-runner.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/block/nbd.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index e21d2ded732b..b07b4452d696 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ struct nbd_device {
>  	struct list_head list;
>  	struct task_struct *task_recv;
>  	struct task_struct *task_setup;
> +
> +	bool shutting_down;
>  };
>  
>  #define NBD_CMD_REQUEUED	1
> @@ -230,8 +232,8 @@ static void nbd_put(struct nbd_device *nbd)
>  	if (refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&nbd->refs,
>  					&nbd_index_mutex)) {
>  		idr_remove(&nbd_index_idr, nbd->index);
> -		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
>  		nbd_dev_remove(nbd);
> +		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1103,6 +1105,7 @@ static int nbd_disconnect(struct nbd_device *nbd)
>  
>  	dev_info(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "NBD_DISCONNECT\n");
>  	set_bit(NBD_DISCONNECT_REQUESTED, &config->runtime_flags);
> +	nbd->shutting_down = true;
>  	send_disconnects(nbd);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1761,6 +1764,12 @@ static int nbd_genl_connect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>  		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (nbd->shutting_down) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
> +		goto again;
> +	}

How does shutting_down get set back to false for the case where
NBD_CFLAG_DESTROY_ON_DISCONNECT is not set, we have done a
nbd_disconnect and now the connect has the nbd index of that existing
device. It seems like the flag is going to be stuck as set.