RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board
From: Lu, Brent
Date: Mon Aug 03 2020 - 12:45:55 EST
> > Hi Takashi,
> > I've double checked with google. It's a must for Chromebooks due to
> > low latency use case.
> I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here?
> I believe Takashi's question was "is this a must to ONLY accept 240 samples
> for the period size", there was no pushback on the value itself.
> Are those boards broken with e.g. 960 samples?
I've added google people to discuss directly.
Would you explain why CRAS needs to use such short period size? Thanks.