Re: [PATCH] time/sched_clock: mark sched_clock_read_begin as notrace

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Sep 29 2020 - 03:13:54 EST


On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:33:31PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:58:59 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > -struct clock_read_data *sched_clock_read_begin(unsigned int *seq)
> > > +notrace struct clock_read_data *sched_clock_read_begin(unsigned int *seq)
> > > {
> > > *seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
> > > return cd.read_data + (*seq & 1);
> >
> > At the very least sched_clock_read_retry() should also be marked such.
> >
> > But Steve, how come x86 works? Our sched_clock() doesn't have notrace on
> > at all.
>
> It's because of that magic in the Makefile that you love so much ;-)
>
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_tsc.o = -pg

ARGH!!, I really should write a script to fix up that mess :/