RE: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

Hi Jean,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang
> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx;
> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B)
> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
> unmanaged ASIDs
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > Hi Jean/zhangfei,
> > Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
> patches
> > that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of
> Eric's series?
> > Please share your thoughts.
> 
> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
> based on mainline? 

Yes. 

 The uacce-devel branches from
> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)

Thanks. 

Hi Eric,

Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense
to rebase on top of either of those?

>From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.

Thanks,
Shameer

> Thanks,
> Jean