Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: add generic selftest support
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Apr 30 2021 - 03:49:46 EST
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:26 AM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 08:45:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Port some parts of the stmmac selftest and reuse it as basic generic selftest
> > > library. This patch was tested with following combinations:
> > > - iMX6DL FEC -> AT8035
> > > - iMX6DL FEC -> SJA1105Q switch -> KSZ8081
> > > - iMX6DL FEC -> SJA1105Q switch -> KSZ9031
> > > - AR9331 ag71xx -> AR9331 PHY
> > > - AR9331 ag71xx -> AR9331 switch -> AR9331 PHY
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 3e1e58d64c3d0a67 ("net: add
> > generic selftest support") upstream.
> > > --- a/net/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/net/Kconfig
> > > @@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ config GRO_CELLS
> > > config SOCK_VALIDATE_XMIT
> > > bool
> > >
> > > +config NET_SELFTESTS
> > > + def_tristate PHYLIB
> > Why does this default to enabled if PHYLIB=y?
> > Usually we allow the user to make selftests modular, independent of the
> > feature under test, but I may misunderstand the purpose of this test.
> > Thanks for your clarification!
> There is nothing against making optional. Should I do it?
Yes please. Thanks!
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds