Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: memory: extend finish_fault() to support large folio

[Baolin Wang]

On 2024/4/23 16:39, Lance Yang wrote:
> Hey Baolin,
>
> [...]
> @@ -4727,9 +4725,11 @@ vm_fault_t finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> [...]
>
> The mm counters have been moved from updating out of set_pte_range(), so we
> we may need to rebase against Kefeng's patch[1].

Yes, I did not rebase on the new mm-unstable branch, and I will do so 
for the next formal patch set. Thanks.