Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] thermal/debugfs: Pass cooling device state to thermal_debug_cdev_add()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:42 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/25/24 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>
> >>> On 4/23/24 19:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> If cdev_dt_seq_show() runs before the first state transition of a cooling
> >>>> device, it will not print any state residency information for it, even
> >>>> though it might be reasonably expected to print residency information for
> >>>> the initial state of the cooling device.
> >>>>
> >>>> For this reason, rearrange the code to get the initial state of a cooling
> >>>> device at the registration time and pass it to thermal_debug_cdev_add(),
> >>>> so that the latter can create a duration record for that state which will
> >>>> allow cdev_dt_seq_show() to print its residency information.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 755113d76786 ("thermal/debugfs: Add thermal cooling device debugfs information")
> >>>> Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c    |    9 +++++++--
> >>>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> >>>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.h |    4 ++--
> >>>>    3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to test it on my board and do the review, but faced issue.
> >>> For some reason I couldn't apply that patch on the latest bleeding-edge
> >>> branch.
> >>> Could you help me in this please? Is there something missing in the
> >>> patch set (like one more fist patch)?
> >>
> >> I messed up the ordering of patches (patch [2/3] should be the last
> >> one in the series) and on top of that, you'll need a small rebase on
> >> that patch.
> >>
> >> Sorry about this, I'll send a v2.
> >
> > Actually, the ordering was OK, but the rebase of the second patch is
> > still needed.  I'll send a v2.
>
> Thanks, I've seen it. That v2 applies smoothly and runs on the board.
> I'll test it and review.

Thank you!

Please also see

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/12427744.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher/

which is actually more urgent because the fixes there address more
serious issues (I would even consider them as 6.9-rc material).

Thanks!