Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] thermal/debugfs: Pass cooling device state to thermal_debug_cdev_add()

From: Lukasz Luba
Date: Thu Apr 25 2024 - 14:56:20 EST




On 4/25/24 19:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:42 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:



On 4/25/24 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Lukasz,

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Rafael,

On 4/23/24 19:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

If cdev_dt_seq_show() runs before the first state transition of a cooling
device, it will not print any state residency information for it, even
though it might be reasonably expected to print residency information for
the initial state of the cooling device.

For this reason, rearrange the code to get the initial state of a cooling
device at the registration time and pass it to thermal_debug_cdev_add(),
so that the latter can create a duration record for that state which will
allow cdev_dt_seq_show() to print its residency information.

Fixes: 755113d76786 ("thermal/debugfs: Add thermal cooling device debugfs information")
Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 9 +++++++--
drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c | 12 ++++++++++--
drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


I'm trying to test it on my board and do the review, but faced issue.
For some reason I couldn't apply that patch on the latest bleeding-edge
branch.
Could you help me in this please? Is there something missing in the
patch set (like one more fist patch)?

I messed up the ordering of patches (patch [2/3] should be the last
one in the series) and on top of that, you'll need a small rebase on
that patch.

Sorry about this, I'll send a v2.

Actually, the ordering was OK, but the rebase of the second patch is
still needed. I'll send a v2.

Thanks, I've seen it. That v2 applies smoothly and runs on the board.
I'll test it and review.

Thank you!

Please also see

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/12427744.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher/

which is actually more urgent because the fixes there address more
serious issues (I would even consider them as 6.9-rc material).

Yes, I've read that patches' headers and glanced through the code.
I'll do the review & testing on them as well today.