On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Thomas Pornin wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.970617091350.1055A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> you write:
> >On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:
> >
> >> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x
> >> kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].
> >
> >Version 2.1.42 works very well, both SMP and non SMP. It has the usual
> >memory allocation problems being worked on and a few other bugs. But
> >it doesn't crash.
>
> Humm... I experienced several solid freezes with 2.1.42 while accessing
> the floppy and the sound device in the same time. But maybe this was due
> to the sound driver I got directly from oss ftp site. The kernel seemed
> to be quite stable otherwise, at least on my single-pentium computer.
>
I too have experienced problems with all the 2.1.4xs (except possibly
.43). Unfortuanatly, I dont know what caused them because the
computer was always unattended at the time.
(non-SMP by the way).
Thanks anyway,
Erv
- --
PGP Public Key: finger walter@fozzie.chem.wisc.edu
PGP Fingerprint: A5 AB 25 7D 7A FD 4D FE BE 21 47 60 0C DC 67 9E
____
----==-- _ / / \
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ / / /\ \ - edwalter@iname.com
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / / /_/\ \ \ - walter@chem.wisc.edu
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ /______\ \ \ - edwalter@students.wisc.edu
\_________\/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM6bV2LkbWT/F2aV1AQGT7QQAiYYto/3I5oAzPl3QnvY7k2BJjmhZ33bA
nMmRs+Tx66YkW+ZOIs3deW6spcjCuLxdf+AFmaS82Kbfnpv7ia4a5Al9m/zhx5Lt
y7bGMvf9pc7YfxwskVbo6ELfuzx2codDGOgytKIi+T1Q9od/TT128qqTLVWy7tP0
CPtULfnnKMo=
=9yQi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----