Re: (reiserfs) Re: LVM / Filesystems / High availability

Raul Miller (rdm@test.legislate.com)
Wed, 24 Jun 1998 08:54:45 -0400

Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> I believe things are actually _simpler_ if you keep it in the
> filesystem.

This means you wouldn't resize the file system to break a raid disk set.

In principle, if you could extract a map which indicates how the
partitions would be laid out after breaking the set, it would be
possible to support file system resizing for raid breaking (which
wouldn't require anything else new for LVM, or would it?).

-- 
Raul


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu