Re: [PATCH] NIPQUAD macro broken on big endian

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 09:21:30 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Do I read this correct?!? Is it more acceptable to have a bug[*], than a not
> optimal fix?!?!?

Yes.
- the bug is purely aesthetic
- the bug only happens on 68k and sparc, ie <1% fo the installed base

Finally, even if the above isn't true, I often reject bug-fixes.
Bug-fixes are _often_ worse than the bug they fix, even with serious bugs.
Because a lot of bug-fixes are "band-aid" - not fixing the bug properly.
And band-aid is BAD. It's worse than even a crashing machine. Because
band-aid never goes away, and nobody cleans it up.

I prefer to have a known bug that will eventually get fixed than an ugly
solution that will hide it forever.

Geert, go away. You don't seem to understand what being a maintainer
means. It means saying no to crap.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/