This would severely suck when something else would be doing
a run_taskqueue(&tq_disk). It would mean that we'd read
n+1..n+15 before n itself.
OTOH, if the disk is lightly loaded it would be an advantage.
I will try it shortly (but don't know how to measure the
results :)...
cheers,
Rik -- the flu hits, the flu hits, the flu hits -- MORE
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/