Re: Y2k compliance
Sat, 5 Dec 1998 05:34:35 +0100

On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 09:12:47AM -0600, S. Shore wrote:

> In fact, the year 2000 isn't a leap year. A little-known rule of leapyears
> (iirc) is that any year divisible by 100 (i think) can't be a leapyear.

A lesser known rule is that years divisble by 400 are leapyears, though ...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at