>(6 machines) have %eax=40000000. Is this consistent with the single-bit
>memory error, or not? If it's purely a hardware problem, should I be
It is.
>and other memory errors might remain undetected, and that the great
>majority of entries will be zero so that all of the errors are likely to
>occur on those pages?
If a bit change happens in the lower bits or a valid address you are going
to generate silenty some more mm corruption and the kernel will become
unstable in other ways.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/