Re: [PATCH 06/24] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Enable pdp0 mailbox

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Thu Sep 25 2025 - 14:50:14 EST


On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 05:23:07PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 15:33, Pankaj Patil
> > <pankaj.patil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Enable pdp0 mailbox node on Glymur SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > > index 66a548400c720474cde8a8b82ee686be507a795f..ae013c64e096b7c90c0aa4cfc50f078a85518acb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > > @@ -4065,6 +4065,14 @@ watchdog@17600000 {
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + pdp0_mbox: mailbox@17610000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,glymur-cpucp-mbox", "qcom,x1e80100-cpucp-mbox";
> > > + reg = <0 0x17610000 0 0x8000>, <0 0x19980000 0 0x8000>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> > > + qcom,rx-chans = <0x7>;
> > > + };
> >
> > Again one node per patch. this is really pointless, please read
> > submitting patches before posting.
> >
>
> In this series I certainly agree with you.
>
> This is most definitely part of the next patch, which is core support
> that should have been part of the introduction of the CPU nodes in the
> initial patch.

I'd say, all CPU-related patches should be squashed. There is no reqason
to have CPU, CPU idles and CPUfreq in 3 different patches.

>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > New Soc is one logical change. One.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry