Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix copy_to_iter return value check

[Markus Elfring]

> The return value of copy_to_iter() function will never be negative,
> it is the number of bytes copied, or zero if nothing was copied.
…

Why do you propose to preserve the comparison operator part “<” then?
Would the condition check “!length” be nicer at this place?

Regards,
Markus