Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix copy_to_iter return value check

[Fushuai Wang]

>> The return value of copy_to_iter() function will never be negative,
>> it is the number of bytes copied, or zero if nothing was copied.
> …
> 
> Why do you propose to preserve the comparison operator part “<” then?
> Would the condition check “!length” be nicer at this place?

Yes, you are right. I will send a v2 shortly.

Regards,
Wang.