Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: add sky1 reset controller
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun Mar 01 2026 - 06:04:49 EST
On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 03:09:08PM +0800, Xueyuan Chen wrote:
> From: Gary Yang <gary.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There are two reset controllers on Cix sky1 Soc.
> One is located in S0 domain, and the other is located
> in S5 domain.
>
> [Xueyuan Chen: Refactored to a flat syscon architecture to fix v3 review issues]
>
> Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <gary.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml | 51 ++++++
> include/dt-bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst-fch.h | 42 +++++
> include/dt-bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.h | 164 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst-fch.h
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..27b6df71c3e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reset/cix,sky1-rst.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: CIX Sky1 Reset Register Region
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Gary Yang <gary.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + - Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + An assortment of registers that control elements of the CIX Sky1 SoC,
> + including resets, clocks, among others.
> + The Reset block acts as a system controller (syscon) and provides
> + reset capabilities to various peripherals.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - cix,sky1-src-s5
> + - cix,sky1-src-fch
> + - const: syscon
I don't understand what is happening here.
Something VERY similar was sent as v9 and this is v4. Compatibles look
different, yet similar.
It looks like you just duplicated a lot bypassing 5 rounds of comments.
That would not be acceptable, we don't review just to be ignored.
Best regards,
Krzysztof