Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: misc: xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s: fix interrupt-parent property

[Conor Dooley]

On 4 March 2026 13:22:48 GMT, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Alexandru Hossu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>For obvious reasons, we can't take patches without any changelog text,
>nor would you want us to.

This is also a second person working on this conversation.
I left commentary on the other version of it.
I am fairly confident that converting this binding is almost useless without evaluating whether this should become a dma engine.
I'm almost certain my employer has something very similar, based on naming and use case, and I saw no reason why it could not be a dma engine.
Any as-is conversation of this should, IMO, come with an evaluation of why this is the correct way to model it.
I don't think it's suitable for any sort of "internship" program that sees binding conversations as low hanging fruit.