Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: misc: xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s: fix interrupt-parent property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/03/2026 14:29, Conor Dooley wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4 March 2026 13:22:48 GMT, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Alexandru Hossu wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> For obvious reasons, we can't take patches without any changelog text,
>> nor would you want us to.
> 
> This is also a second person working on this conversation.

I see, so that's a patch for something which does not exist yet (not
merged).

> I left commentary on the other version of it.
> I am fairly confident that converting this binding is almost useless without evaluating whether this should become a dma engine.
> I'm almost certain my employer has something very similar, based on naming and use case, and I saw no reason why it could not be a dma engine.
> Any as-is conversation of this should, IMO, come with an evaluation of why this is the correct way to model it.
> I don't think it's suitable for any sort of "internship" program that sees binding conversations as low hanging fruit.

Do you suspect another round of some GSoC or LFX mentorship?

Best regards,
Krzysztof