Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI: Add CXL DVSEC control, lock, and range register definitions
From: Alex Williamson
Date: Fri Mar 06 2026 - 12:46:34 EST
On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 08:00:15 +0000
<smadhavan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> PCI: Add CXL DVSEC control, lock, and range register definitions
>
> Add register offset and field definitions for CXL DVSEC registers needed
> by CXL state save/restore across resets:
>
> - CTRL2 (offset 0x10) and LOCK (offset 0x14) registers
> - CONFIG_LOCK bit in the LOCK register
> - RWL (read-write-when-locked) field masks for CTRL and range base
> registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> index ec1c54b5a310..6fdc20d7f5e6 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -1353,14 +1353,20 @@
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_HDM_COUNT __GENMASK(5, 4)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL 0xC
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_ENABLE _BITUL(2)
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL_RWL 0x5FED
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL2 0x10
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_LOCK 0x14
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_LOCK_CONFIG _BITUL(0)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_SIZE_HIGH(i) (0x18 + (i * 0x10))
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_SIZE_LOW(i) (0x1C + (i * 0x10))
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_INFO_VALID _BITUL(0)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_ACTIVE _BITUL(1)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_SIZE_LOW __GENMASK(31, 28)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_BASE_HIGH(i) (0x20 + (i * 0x10))
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_BASE_HI_RWL 0xFFFFFFFF
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_BASE_LOW(i) (0x24 + (i * 0x10))
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_BASE_LOW __GENMASK(31, 28)
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_RANGE_BASE_LO_RWL 0xF0000000
>
> #define CXL_DVSEC_RANGE_MAX 2
>
These RWL defines really seem to be more kernel policy than spec
definitions. Do they really belong in the uAPI header? Thanks,
Alex