Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Drop IRQC_NUM_IRQ macro

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, Feb 27 2026 at 14:03, Biju wrote:
> @@ -136,7 +145,7 @@ static void rzg2l_irqc_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
>  	raw_spin_lock(&priv->lock);
>  	if (hw_irq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
>  		rzg2l_clear_irq_int(priv, hw_irq);
> -	else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq < IRQC_NUM_IRQ)
> +	else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq < priv->info.num_irq)
>  		rzg2l_clear_tint_int(priv, hw_irq);

As I pointed out in the review of the RZV2H driver:

   https://lore.kernel.org/all/87ecmavbs0.ffs@tglx/

this really begs for separate interrupt chips so that the decision is
made at setup time and not at every interrupt delivery in the hotpath.

Aren't you guys working together?

Thanks,

        tglx