[PATCH v2 00/11] clk: qcom: sc8180x: PM-related fixes (and refactoring)

[Val Packett]

v2:
- collect tags
- bring in dispcc patch mentioned in cover letter
- add a couple new discoveries (mostly camcc related)
- add refactoring to current style (qcom_cc_driver_data)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260309010214.224621-1-val@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

Also bonus new question: I found
https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.14/-/commit/489da2db487312fdaf9441056745490031b59f55
and almost included a patch adding `.skip_retention_level = true` to MMCX
in rpmhpd for the SoC, but.. it should not be necessary, right?
Just having low_svs as the requested OPP in the consumers in the DT
shooould be enough to make sure it's always at least at low_svs?
(I *thought* it might've helped with the GDSC stuck-off issue for
both Titan and MDSS but it's more likely the other fixes..)

~val

Val Packett (11):
  dt-bindings: clock: qcom,gcc-sc8180x: Add missing GDSCs
  clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Add missing GDSCs
  clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Use retention for USB power domains
  clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Use retention for PCIe power domains
  clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Enable runtime PM support
  clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: Refactor to use qcom_cc_driver_data
  clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: Use shared ops on the mdss vsync clk
  clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: Enable parents for pixel clocks
  clk: qcom: camcc-sc8180x: Remove wait_val for Titan GDSC
  clk: qcom: camcc-sc8180x: Add missing HW_CTRL GDSC flag
  clk: qcom: camcc-sc8180x: Refactor to use qcom_cc_driver_data

 drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8180x.c             |  76 ++++++-----
 drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c             |   6 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8180x.c               | 126 +++++++++++++------
 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8180x.h |   5 +
 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0