Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: rcg2: expand frac table for mdss_pixel_clk_src

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 01:54:29PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3/21/26 10:50 AM, Pengyu Luo wrote:
> > Recently, when testing 10-bit dsi C-PHY panel, clks are different
> > from the usual. (dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk's parent is dsi0_pll_bit_clk
> > now (dsiclk_sel = 0)) And we failed to set dsiclk's children.
> > 
> > dsi_link_clk_set_rate_6g: Set clk rates: pclk=172992000, byteclk=108120000
> > 
> > byteclk was set first to 108120000, so the vco rate was set to
> > 108120000 * 7 * 1 * 1 = 756840000. When we was trying to set
> > 172992000 on mdss_pixel_clk_src later.
> > 
> > Since there was no matched ratio, we failed to set it. And dsiclk
> > divider ratio was set to 15:1 (wrong cached register value 0xf and
> > didn't update), we finally got 50455997, apparently wrong.
> > 
> >   dsi0vco_clk                1       1        0        756839941
> >      dsi0_pll_out_div_clk    1       1        0        756839941
> >         dsi0_pll_post_out_div_clk 0       0        0        216239983
> >         dsi0_pll_bit_clk     2       2        0        756839941
> >            dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk 2       2        0        50455997
> >               disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src 1       1        0        50455997
> >            dsi0_pll_by_2_bit_clk 0       0        0        378419970
> >            dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk 2       2        0        108119991
> >               disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src 2       2        0        108119991
> > 
> > Downstream clk_summary shows the mdss_pixel_clk_src support the
> > ratio(35:16)
> > 
> >  dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk             2       2        0        378420000
> >      disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src       1       1        0        172992000
> >  dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk            2       2        0        108120000
> >      disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src       2       2        0        108120000
> > 
> > After checking downstream source, 15:4 also seems to be supported,
> > add them two.
> 
> I don't see that, not even in the newest releases.. Is there even a reason
> we have to list these divider pairs in the first place?

https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/qcom/-/commit/f7aec4359448d25c8a8d21ad8e8733d61f6b69ab

We need those dividers to correctly program pclk RCG2 clocks.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry