Re: [PATCH] docs: Document pahole v1.26 requirement for KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS kfuncs

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:06:28PM -0700, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> On 3/24/26 11:46 AM, zhidao su wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:12 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> I don't think that's true.
> >> At least when implicit args were designed the goal was to avoid
> >> pahole dependencies.
> >> Please share exact steps to reproduce.
> > 
> > Here are the exact reproduction steps and code path analysis.
> 
> Hi everyone, sorry I'm late to the party.
> 
> First of all, a *Nack* to the doc change in isolation, I agree with
> Alexei here. Tejun, I suggest to revert it.

Ah, right, this isn't sched_ext proper even. Sorry about that. Reverting.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun