Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Renesas RZ/G3L RSPI support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 01:32:29PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: 02 April 2026 14:20
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Renesas RZ/G3L RSPI support
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 01:00:28PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:

> > > Gentle ping.

> > There's strongly negative feedback from Krzysztof...

> I believe Krzysztof is complaining about patch [1] and his
> comments were addressed in [2].

That's really not at all clear from the discussion.

Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and
issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much
easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access.
I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise
travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about
making things a bit easier to read.

> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review.  People get busy,
> > go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical
> > bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been review comments then
> > people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

> > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong
> > you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there
> > are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are
> > normally handled.

> There is no pending points, everything addressed in [2]. that is the reason for
> sending gentle reminder.

There's more there than just "make sure you've addressed review
comments".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature